Overview & Reviews

The Yukon XL gains numerous functional enhancements for 2003. The Quadrasteer four-wheel steering system is now available on 3/4-ton models for increased maneuverability and better stability when towing, while 1/2-ton versions now offer the Stabilitrak stability control system. Also this year, buyers get a choice of two new optional exterior mirrors: a multifunction power fold-away version with puddle lamps and integrated turn signal lights or extended camper mirrors that are also power foldable. The interior gets numerous upgrades that include tri-zone climate control, an enhanced driver-information center and a redesigned center console and instrument panel. Steering wheel-mounted audio controls are now optional, as are second-row captain's chairs and power adjustable pedals. A revised lineup of entertainment options offers buyers a Bose audio system as well as XM Satellite Radio and a DVD-based entertainment system. Finally, for increased safety, the Yukon XL now features a standard front-passenger-sensing system, dual-stage airbags and three point seatbelts for all positions in the first and second rows.

• Huge interior space, strong V8-engine lineup, Quadrasteer four-wheel steering system, extensive list of available features.

• Some cheap interior materials considering the price, questionable build quality.

User Reviews:

Showing 71 through 80 of 91.00

• 

  Not likley to ge back to GM - 2003 GMC Yukon XL
  By DavidB - January 8 - 11:43 am

  This vehicle has been, without a doubt, the worst value for money that I have spent. I have purchased 8 NEW GM products. This is the most that I have spent and the most dissapointed that I have been (35% of purchase price on repairs, not maintenance). Head gasket leaked at 70,000 km. Random electrical failures from the onset have resulted in more than 35 dead battery incidents. Random sluggish performance due to fuel issues (new pump has not fixed the problem). Recently has been dieing on the road with 3/4 tank of gas!! This vehicle had great potential but the quality of the components has really killed my opinion. At least OnStar works when these things happened to my wife!

• 

  Prolonged Old Design - 2003 GMC Yukon XL
  By Unser - December 17 - 10:00 am

  A first cousin with the Suburban, these vehicles ride real smooth on highways due to its weight. It is also its drawback. Low fuel economy, inflexible seating arrangement although its roomy. 2nd row Seats dont recline. Third row seats have to be taken out of vehicle to achieve space while the 2nd row folds flat. May need some interior and exterior design to optimize comfort and practicality.

• 

  MY YUKON XL - 2003 GMC Yukon XL
  By Rhoda/Han - October 24 - 10:00 am

  ITS ONE OF A KIND, TO DRIVE. STEERING CONTROL IS GREAT--LIKE YOURE DRIVING A CAR. THE BRAKES ARE AWESOME TOO. LOVE THE CARGO ROOM. THE ENGINE IS THE BEST. A SAFE PLACE FOR THE KIDS TO RIDE IN. I LOVE MY YUKON.

• 

  Great Vehicle If You Need Big - 2003 GMC Yukon XL
  By gatescrash - September 2 - 3:10 am

  Bought new as 03 leftover in Jan 2004, Had an issue with the AC leaking out and it took a few trips to the dealer to fix, but I blame the dealer for so many trips as they should have fixed in 1 or 2 trips, not 4. As far as big SUVs go this is one of the best. Ride comfort is great, plenty of room for camping, skiing, etc equipment. It tows an 18 foot bass boat like its not even there and thats with just the 5.3 in it. Id buy another one in the future but we only put 9K on this one per year so Ive go a few years of use left in the old girl. Its a heavy vehicle so youll replace brake pads around 50K and the e-brake drum rusts out so you end up replacing the rear drums, so use them ofte

• 

  After 7.5 years - 2003 GMC Yukon XL
  By Roman Nowwakiwsky - June 15 - 5:33 am

  The practicality of this vehicle is excellent. We tow a 4500 lb boat, live in the mountains with tons of snow, travel a lot in the summer heat, and this truck has served us well. Many drivers, wife, sons, daughter, all enjoy never having to ask "can we take this". GM has been poor on service, replaced costly front hub, speedo stopped working after warranty. Truck has 99k miles and working well with regular maintenance at non-dealer shop. All shops know Chevy engine so they can maintain it. Replaced battery, windshield washer hose, brakes, tires & snow tires, as usual. I believe there is not another utility vehicle out there as a choice for roomy loading and comfort. Leather seats last.

• 

  Once again America Fails - 2003 GMC Yukon XL
  By laxman - April 8 - 10:00 am

  I have my Yukon XL for 22 months. I am dissapointed in the build on the truck. I have a problem with the front end rattling after 15,000 miles. Also, the middle seat froze on me and needs a new seat riser. The best is that the dealer knows that the front end is an occurance with most 2003s. They did not have the part and said it would take a week. well 2 weeks later I call up and still no part. I guess when its under warranty, they dont want to fix the problem. I have to hound them for the part!!! I wish Toyota or Nissan would make a truck as big so I could byu!!

• 

  Denali 2003 - 2003 GMC Yukon XL
  By Denaliman - April 4 - 2:00 am

  Fun to drive. Interior finish should be of higher quality for a vehicle of this price point. Ride is a bit truck like compared to 2 wheel drive with auto ride suspension.

• 

  Nice Land Yacht - 2003 GMC Yukon XL
  By rnmyers - April 4 - 2:00 am

  If you must drive a big SUV, or just really want to, the XL Denali is a fine choice. The drive train is delightfully capable for a vehicle this size. The truck also feels more nimble when cornering than you might imagine -- again for a vehicle of this size. The seats are very comfortable and supportive, the new steering-wheel mounted radio controls are convenient, the XM radio is surprisingly enjoyable, and the interior space is just about unbeatable. Done up in onyx black, this truck is also a real head-turner across all age groups.

• 

  Worse MPG than my "91 Suburban - 2003 GMC Yukon XL
  By SamanthaSpade - February 19 - 10:00 am

  I replaced my 1991 Suburban. Thats the Old Old tank model. The 03 xl shakes you with every little bump in the road. At first it would bump my foot off the gas petal. This is not a heavy duty, made to last truck. The metal is very thin. You should not lean against the truck it may pop inwards on the metal. OK so I am getting use to this, but a truck thats half the weight of the 1991 Burb and not as solidly build interior or exterior, about 1/2 less leg room and storage compartment, and less the extra amenities, (1991 was a 2500 upgraded interior), I HOPED THE GAS MILEGE FOR ALL THESE MINUS WOULD MEAN BETTER GAS MILEAGE, GUESS AGAIN. My 91 was about 12-14MPG all around. My 03 xl gets just over 11 all around. UGH! I did not purchase for the gas mileage, I purchased for safety. BUT I thought I would get 2+ MPG better in the xl. I write so your not expecting what the advertisement says UP to14city -17on the highway. the Up to is really stretching it.

• 

  GM maintains its UN-reliable reputation - 2003 GMC Yukon XL
  By bandaid6699 - January 30 - 1:16 am

  Four years is all I could tolerate with this beast. Yes, it has tons of room and a lot of nice luxury features. However, regular major breakdowns and frustratingly fragile parts has me switching to Ford for my future vehicles. The transmission has had two major failures and another one is eminent. Fuel pump, water pump, various electrical glitches also frustrate. We bought it used but 60,000 miles later Ill probably have to give it away...